[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54EE0268.2040201@linn.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:12:08 +0000
From: Stathis Voukelatos <stathis.voukelatos@...n.co.uk>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] Linn Ethernet Packet Sniffer driver
Hi Richard,
On 25/02/15 17:01, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 04:19:45PM +0100, Richard Cochran wrote:
>> Let me suggest another approach that stays in line with the existing
>> frame work. Based on the device's limitations and your own example,
>> it seems clear that the intended use case is synchronization for AVB
>> applications using gPTP.
>
> Also, forgot to say, expose your clock as a PTP Hardware Clock (PHC).
>
Regarding this last point, the actual counter that generates the
timestamps is not part of the sniffer H/W module. Timestamps are
provided to the sniffer externally in H/W by a different module.
Apart of that there is not eg. a sniffer register to read the current
counter value. I wonder if it should be the driver for the module where
the counter belongs (called Event Timer in the Pistachio Soc) that
should register the PHC.
I need some more time to study your other suggestions regarding the PHY
timestamping framework.
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
Regards,
Stathis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists