linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/memcontrol: fix NULL pointer dereference when use

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150225012013.GC16796@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
Date:	Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:20:13 +0900
From:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memcontrol: fix NULL pointer dereference when
 use_hierarchy is 0

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 09:33:27AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 17-02-15 14:24:59, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > It can be possible to return NULL in parent_mem_cgroup()
> > if use_hierarchy is 0.
> 
> This alone is not sufficient because the low limit is present only in
> the unified hierarchy API and there is no use_hierarchy there. The
> primary issue here is that the memcg has 0 usage so the previous
> check for usage will not stop us. And that is bug IMO.
> 
> I think that the following patch would be more correct from semantic
> POV:
> ---
> >From f5d74671d30e44c50b45b4464c92f536f1dbdff6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:02:12 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] memcg: fix low limit calculation
> 
> A memcg is considered low limited even when the current usage is equal
> to the low limit. This leads to interesting side effects e.g.
> groups/hierarchies with no memory accounted are considered protected and
> so the reclaim will emit MEMCG_LOW event when encountering them.
> 
> Another and much bigger issue was reported by Joonsoo Kim. He has hit a
> NULL ptr dereference with the legacy cgroup API which even doesn't have
> low limit exposed. The limit is 0 by default but the initial check fails
> for memcg with 0 consumption and parent_mem_cgroup() would return NULL
> if use_hierarchy is 0 and so page_counter_read would try to dereference
> NULL.
> 
> I suppose that the current implementation is just an overlook because
> the documentation in Documentation/cgroups/unified-hierarchy.txt says:
> "
> The memory.low boundary on the other hand is a top-down allocated
> reserve.  A cgroup enjoys reclaim protection when it and all its
> ancestors are below their low boundaries
> "
> 
> Fix the usage and the low limit comparision in mem_cgroup_low accordingly.
> 
> Fixes: 241994ed8649 (mm: memcontrol: default hierarchy interface for memory)
> Reported-by: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>

Good! This fixes my issue.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/