[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54EE11C5.8000307@free-electrons.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:17:41 -0300
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Tyler Hall <tylerwhall@...il.com>
CC: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: armada: read stable temp on Armada XP
On 02/25/2015 02:04 PM, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>>
>> My conclusions about these registers are based on experimental data. The
>> documentation is very sparse, but the Thermal Manager Control and Status
>> Register looks like the preferred register given the way it is laid out in the
>> public spec.
>
> Ezequiel,
>
> as you worked on this do you know why we used the Thermal Sensor Status Register
> instead of the Thermal Manager Control and Status Register ?
> My first guess is that the giving the name of the registers the 1st one made
> more sens to use for a thermal sensor.
>
Actually, we based this driver in the vendor bootloader. The specs weren't
of much use back then.
--
Ezequiel GarcĂa, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists