| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 14:52:00 +0700
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Peter Hung <hpeter@...il.com>
Cc: johan@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tom_tsai@...tek.com.tw, peter_hong@...tek.com.tw,
Peter Hung <hpeter+linux_kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 08/11] USB: f81232: implement set_termios()
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 06:16:23PM +0800, Peter Hung wrote:
> The original driver had do not any h/w change in driver.
> This patch implements with configure H/W for
> baud/parity/word length/stop bits functional in f81232_set_termios().
>
> This patch also implement DTR/RTS control when baudrate B0.
> We drop DTR/RTS when B0, otherwise enable it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hung <hpeter+linux_kernel@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/serial/f81232.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/f81232.c b/drivers/usb/serial/f81232.c
> index f5c9060..0c96b9a 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/serial/f81232.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/f81232.c
> @@ -31,14 +31,19 @@ static const struct usb_device_id id_table[] = {
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(usb, id_table);
>
> +/* Maximum baudrate for F81232 */
> +#define F81232_MAX_BAUDRATE 115200
> +
> /* USB Control EP parameter */
> #define F81232_REGISTER_REQUEST 0xA0
> #define F81232_GET_REGISTER 0xc0
> #define F81232_SET_REGISTER 0x40
>
> #define SERIAL_BASE_ADDRESS 0x0120
> +#define RECEIVE_BUFFER_REGISTER (0x00 + SERIAL_BASE_ADDRESS)
> #define INTERRUPT_ENABLE_REGISTER (0x01 + SERIAL_BASE_ADDRESS)
> #define FIFO_CONTROL_REGISTER (0x02 + SERIAL_BASE_ADDRESS)
> +#define LINE_CONTROL_REGISTER (0x03 + SERIAL_BASE_ADDRESS)
> #define MODEM_CONTROL_REGISTER (0x04 + SERIAL_BASE_ADDRESS)
> #define MODEM_STATUS_REGISTER (0x06 + SERIAL_BASE_ADDRESS)
>
> @@ -64,6 +69,14 @@ struct f81232_private {
> struct usb_serial_port *port;
> };
>
> +static int calc_baud_divisor(u32 baudrate)
> +{
> + if (!baudrate)
> + return 0;
Check no longer needed since you added the check at the call site. Just
add a comment. In fact it look like you can get rid of this function
now.
> + else
> + return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(F81232_MAX_BAUDRATE, baudrate);
> +}
> +
> static int f81232_get_register(struct usb_serial_port *port, u16 reg, u8 *data)
> {
> int status;
> @@ -369,6 +382,52 @@ static void f81232_break_ctl(struct tty_struct *tty, int break_state)
> */
> }
>
> +static void f81232_set_baudrate(struct usb_serial_port *port, int baudrate)
> +{
> + u8 divisor, lcr;
> + int status = 0;
> +
> + if (!baudrate)
> + return;
> +
> + divisor = calc_baud_divisor(baudrate);
> +
> + status = f81232_get_register(port, LINE_CONTROL_REGISTER,
> + &lcr); /* get LCR */
> + if (status) {
> + dev_err(&port->dev, "%s failed to get LCR: %d\n",
> + __func__, status);
> + }
> +
> + status = f81232_set_register(port, LINE_CONTROL_REGISTER,
> + lcr | UART_LCR_DLAB); /* Enable DLAB */
> + if (status) {
> + dev_err(&port->dev, "%s failed to set DLAB: %d\n",
> + __func__, status);
> + }
> +
> + status = f81232_set_register(port, RECEIVE_BUFFER_REGISTER,
> + divisor & 0x00ff); /* low */
> + if (status) {
> + dev_err(&port->dev, "%s failed to set baudrate MSB: %d\n",
> + __func__, status);
> + }
> +
> + status = f81232_set_register(port, INTERRUPT_ENABLE_REGISTER,
> + (divisor & 0xff00) >> 8); /* high */
> + if (status) {
> + dev_err(&port->dev, "%s failed to set baudrate LSB: %d\n",
> + __func__, status);
> + }
> +
> + status = f81232_set_register(port, LINE_CONTROL_REGISTER,
> + lcr & ~UART_LCR_DLAB);
> + if (status) {
> + dev_err(&port->dev, "%s failed to set DLAB: %d\n",
> + __func__, status);
> + }
> +}
Again, what about the error handling? No need to continue setting the
other registers should the first one fail, right? And you always want to
restore LCR to its previous value.
> +
> static int f81232_port_enable(struct usb_serial_port *port, int enable)
> {
> u8 data = 0;
> @@ -399,15 +458,54 @@ static int f81232_port_enable(struct usb_serial_port *port, int enable)
> static void f81232_set_termios(struct tty_struct *tty,
> struct usb_serial_port *port, struct ktermios *old_termios)
> {
> - /* FIXME - Stubbed out for now */
> + u8 new_lcr = 0;
> + int status = 0;
> +
>
> /* Don't change anything if nothing has changed */
> if (old_termios && !tty_termios_hw_change(&tty->termios, old_termios))
> return;
>
> - /* Do the real work here... */
> - if (old_termios)
> - tty_termios_copy_hw(&tty->termios, old_termios);
> + if (C_BAUD(tty) == B0)
> + f81232_set_mctrl(port, 0, TIOCM_DTR | TIOCM_RTS);
> + else if (old_termios && (old_termios->c_cflag & CBAUD) == B0)
> + f81232_set_mctrl(port, TIOCM_DTR | TIOCM_RTS, 0);
> +
> + f81232_set_baudrate(port, tty_get_baud_rate(tty));
Check for B0 here instead of in the helper.
And what about unsupported baudrates (e.g. > 115200 baud)? You should
return the baudrate actually used in that case using
tty_termios_encode_baud_rate.
Johan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists