[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1502251711400.1301-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:13:04 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Ameen Ali <ameenali023@...il.com>
cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ohci-tmio.c : missing 'break' statements
The "break" statements are missing by intention.
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Ameen Ali wrote:
> Redundant bitwise operation on 'pm' in 'switch' statement.
Why do you say the operations are redundant?
> Signed-off-by : Ameen Ali <Ameenali023@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/host/ohci-tmio.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-tmio.c b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-tmio.c
> index e9a6eec..c580615 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-tmio.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-tmio.c
> @@ -102,10 +102,13 @@ static void tmio_stop_hc(struct platform_device *dev)
> dev_err(&dev->dev, "Unsupported amount of ports: %d\n", ohci->num_ports);
> case 3:
> pm |= CCR_PM_USBPW3;
> + break;
> case 2:
> pm |= CCR_PM_USBPW2;
> + break;
> case 1:
> pm |= CCR_PM_USBPW1;
> + break;
> }
> tmio_iowrite8(0, tmio->ccr + CCR_INTC);
> tmio_iowrite8(0, tmio->ccr + CCR_ILME);
This patch is wrong. Figuring out why is left as an exercise.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists