[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150225020854.636213026@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 18:10:28 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 3.18 13/20] tcp: ipv4: initialize unicast_sock sk_pacing_rate
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
[ Upstream commit 811230cd853d62f09ed0addd0ce9a1b9b0e13fb5 ]
When I added sk_pacing_rate field, I forgot to initialize its value
in the per cpu unicast_sock used in ip_send_unicast_reply()
This means that for sch_fq users, RST packets, or ACK packets sent
on behalf of TIME_WAIT sockets might be sent to slowly or even dropped
once we reach the per flow limit.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Fixes: 95bd09eb2750 ("tcp: TSO packets automatic sizing")
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/ipv4/ip_output.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
@@ -1517,6 +1517,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct inet_sock,
.sk_wmem_alloc = ATOMIC_INIT(1),
.sk_allocation = GFP_ATOMIC,
.sk_flags = (1UL << SOCK_USE_WRITE_QUEUE),
+ .sk_pacing_rate = ~0U,
},
.pmtudisc = IP_PMTUDISC_WANT,
.uc_ttl = -1,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists