[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150226105304.GB12992@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:53:04 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
Cc: Gustavo Bittencourt <gbitten@...il.com>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.18.7-rt2
* Mike Galbraith | 2015-02-26 09:02:05 [+0100]:
>I found what was breaking my core2 lappy in 4.0-rt as well, namely the
4.0-rt? So you are a time traveler?
>locking, ww_mutex: fix ww_mutex vs self-deadlock
>
>If the caller already holds the mutex, task_blocks_on_rt_mutex()
>returns -EDEADLK, we proceed directly to rt_mutex_handle_deadlock()
>where it's instant game over.
The EDDEADLK / ELREADY seem to got broken duering the rtmutex rework.
Now I see:
| Wound/wait tests |
---------------------
ww api failures: ok | ok | ok |
ww contexts mixing: ok | ok |
finishing ww context: ok | ok | ok | ok |
locking mismatches: ok | ok | ok |
EDEADLK handling: ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok |
spinlock nest unlocked: ok |
with no backtrace from the ww code which I haven't seen before that
patch. Applied.
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists