linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] pwm-backlight: Allow backlight to remain disabled on boot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150226110659.GO6688@x1>
Date:	Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:06:59 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>, Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] pwm-backlight: Allow backlight to remain disabled on boot

On Thu, 31 Jul 2014, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> 
> The default for backlight devices is to be enabled immediately when
> registering with the backlight core. This can be useful for setups that
> use a simple framebuffer device and where the backlight cannot otherwise
> be hooked up to the panel.
> 
> However, when dealing with more complex setups, such as those of recent
> ARM SoCs, this can be problematic. Since the backlight is usually setup
> separately from the display controller, the probe order is not usually
> deterministic. That can lead to situations where the backlight will be
> powered up and the panel will show an uninitialized framebuffer.
> 
> Furthermore, subsystems such as DRM have advanced functionality to set
> the power mode of a panel. In order to allow such setups to power up the
> panel at exactly the right moment, a way is needed to prevent the
> backlight core from powering the backlight up automatically when it is
> registered.
> 
> This commit introduces a new boot_off field in the platform data (and
> also implements getting the same information from device tree). When set
> the initial backlight power mode will be set to "off".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> ---
> I've been meaning to send this for a while but was always holding back
> because of the indoctrination that this type of configuration shouldn't
> be part of device tree. However this issue was recently raised again in
> the context of power up sequences for display panels. As described above
> the issue is that panel datasheets recommend that the backlight attached
> to a panel be turned on at the very last step to avoid visual glitches
> during the panel's power up sequence. With the current implementation it
> is typical for the backlight to be probed before the display panel. That
> has, in many cases, the side-effect of enabling the backlight, therefore
> making the screen content visible before it's actually initialized.
> 
> Some panels come up with random garbage when uninitialized, others show
> all white. With some luck the panel will be all black and users won't
> really notice.
> 
> This patch is an attempt to enable boards to override the default of
> turning on the backlight for the pwm-backlight driver. I'm not sure if
> there was a specific reason to turn on the backlight by default when
> this driver was initially written, but the fact is that since it has
> pretty much always been like this we can't really go and change the
> default, otherwise a lot of people may end up with no backlight and no
> clue as to how to enable it. So the only reasonable thing we can do is
> to keep the old behaviour and give new boards a way to override it if
> they know that some other part of the stack will enable it at the right
> moment.
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/video/backlight/pwm-backlight.txt         | 1 +
>  drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c                                  | 8 ++++++++
>  include/linux/pwm_backlight.h                                     | 2 ++
>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+)

Some people on the list are talking about this again.

What was the verdict?

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/