[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150226111250.GA32024@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 12:12:50 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, LKP ML <lkp@...org>,
x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [x86/mm/ASLR] f47233c2d34: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at
arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:63 __ioremap_check_ram+0x445/0x4a0()
* Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de> wrote:
> thanks for the report.
>
> So, AFAICT, this is caused by ksysfs ioremapping struct
> setup_data for a short time so that it can count it and
> show it in /sys/kernel/boot_params/setup_data/*
>
> And, of course, the setup_data thing which we're using
> for kaslr param passing is RAM and ioremap complains.
>
> And currently I don't have a good idea how to fix it.
> Perhaps introduce an ioremap_* something which suppresses
> the warning as we're going to iounmap() right afterwards
> but that's ugly.
Why is it ioremap()-ed to begin with, why cannot the kernel
access its own data structure in RAM directly?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists