lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK1hOcPwYYfs7aoJFdpr12j+Ed--BSUr=pu9Ba05brfeeZnyXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Feb 2015 13:11:48 +0100
From:	Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
	Andrey Wagin <avagin@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
	Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 v3] x86: entry_64.S: always allocate complete "struct pt_regs"

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Denys Vlasenko
<vda.linux@...glemail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> In addition to my previous tests, I ran my home machine with
> patched kernel. Unfortunately, it works for me :(
>
> Will try on yet another machine.

And voila, it does happen on another machine :)

I'm debugging it right now. Looks like 64-bit syscalls just stop working
at some point in new processes. That is, existing process is alive and well,
but children get SEGV after fork (most likely on any syscall64 they do,
not after fork per se. They eventually manage to kill themselves -
not trivial when exit syscall isn't working either - by tripping on HLT insn).

32-bit syscalls (int 80) continue to work. Fork, exec, whatever you want.
I have static 32-bit busybox binary and everything works there.

Also, any 64-bit process which was under strace continues to work correctly,
including forks and execs.

This points towards some bug on fast path sysret64 code. Looking for it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ