[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54EF3AC9.3060808@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 10:24:57 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpusets,isolcpus: add file to show isolated cpus
in cpuset
On 02/26/2015 06:05 AM, Zefan Li wrote:
>> +static void cpuset_seq_print_isolcpus(struct seq_file *sf, struct cpuset *cs)
>> +{
>> + cpumask_var_t my_isolated_cpus;
>> +
>> + if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&my_isolated_cpus, GFP_KERNEL))
>> + return;
>> +
>
> Make it return -ENOMEM ? Or make it a global variable and allocate memory for it
> in cpuset_init().
OK, can do.
I see that cpuset_common_seq_show already takes a lock, so having
one global variable for this should not introduce any additional
contention.
I will send a v4.
>> @@ -1733,6 +1748,9 @@ static int cpuset_common_seq_show(struct seq_file *sf, void *v)
>> case FILE_EFFECTIVE_MEMLIST:
>> seq_printf(sf, "%*pbl\n", nodemask_pr_args(&cs->effective_mems));
>> break;
>> + case FILE_ISOLCPUS:
>> + cpuset_seq_print_isolcpus(sf, cs);
>> + break;
>> default:
>> ret = -EINVAL;
>> }
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists