[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54EF4631.1090903@broadcom.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 08:13:37 -0800
From: Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
CC: <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Ian Campbell" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Jonathan Richardson <jonathar@...adcom.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...gle.com>,
Anatol Pomazao <anatol@...gle.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Input: bcm-keypad: add device tree bindings
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for the update of no need to change any of dt-binding prefixes.
I just sent out a v2 patch addressing all of your other comments.
On 15-02-23 09:49 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 09:17:51PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 08:49:15AM -0800, Scott Branden wrote:
>>> On 15-02-09 04:51 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 04:07:40PM -0800, Scott Branden wrote:
>>>>> +
>>>>> +- col-debounce-filter-period: The debounce period for the Column filter.
>>>>> +
>>>>> + KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_1_ms = 0
>>>>> + KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_2_ms = 1
>>>>> + KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_4_ms = 2
>>>>> + KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_8_ms = 3
>>>>
>>>>> + KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_16_ms = 4
>>>>> + KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_32_ms = 5
>>>>> + KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_64_ms = 6
>>>>> + KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_128_ms = 7
>>>>> +
>>>>> +- status-debounce-filter-period: The debounce period for the Status filter.
>>>>> +
>>>>> + KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_1_ms = 0
>>>>> + KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_2_ms = 1
>>>>> + KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_4_ms = 2
>>>>> + KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_8_ms = 3
>>>>> + KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_16_ms = 4
>>>>> + KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_32_ms = 5
>>>>> + KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_64_ms = 6
>>>>> + KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_128_ms = 7
>>>>
>>>> I could swear device-specific properties should be in form of
>>>> <vendor-prefix>,<property-name> to ensure it won't clash with changes on
>>>> subsystem level later on. Device-tree folks, what say you?
>>> I see examples with and without vendor-prefix.
>>> qcom,pm8xxx-keypad.txt does not have prefixes
>>> st-keyscan.txt does have a prefix
>>>
>>> I can't find any documented guidelines for this.
>>
>> As I mentioned I'll try to get clarification on this.
>
> I have chatted with a couple of people on this and it is acceptable to
> omit vendor prefix in bindings when we are using a specific driver like
> we have here (i.e. when driver's compatible string already includes
> vendor prefix). Vendor prefixes on properties are required when we
> augment a generic driver's binding.
>
> So the above 2 entries are fine as is.
>
> Thanks.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists