[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1502260922160.3409@vshiva-Udesk>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 09:26:51 -0800 (PST)
From: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...el.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Shivappa, Vikas" <vikas.shivappa@...el.com>,
"Fleming, Matt" <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
"Auld, Will" <will.auld@...el.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Kleen, Andi" <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
"Juvva, Kanaka D" <kanaka.d.juvva@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/7] x86/intel_rdt: Intel Cache Allocation
Technology
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Luck, Tony <tony.luck@...el.com> wrote:
>
>>> The CAT thing was annoying already, but at least one
>>> can find that in the SDM, this RDT thing, not a single
>>> mention.
>>
>> The problems of development at the bleeding edge. Would
>> you rather Linux sat on the sidelines until there are
>> enough Google hits from other users of new features?
>
> Well, we'd prefer there to be A) published documentation,
> or, lacking published documentation, there be B) a coherent
> technical description within the code itself what the
> purpose is and how it all works conceptually (minus the
> buzzwords), so that we have a common starting point when
> reviewing it.
Will add a description with in the code if that helps.
Thanks,
Vikas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists