[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150226181338.GF3314@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:13:38 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] x86, alternatives: Instruction padding and more
robust JMPs
Hi all,
So this alternatives patchset breaks perf bench mem, here are a couple
of patches ontop, you guys tell me whether it makes sense. I wanted to
make it run all memset/memcpy routines so here are a couple of patches
which do this:
./perf bench mem memset -l 20MB -r all
# Running 'mem/memset' benchmark:
Routine default (Default memset() provided by glibc)
# Copying 20MB Bytes ...
1.136000 GB/Sec
6.026304 GB/Sec (with prefault)
Routine x86-64-unrolled (unrolled memset() in arch/x86/lib/memset_64.S)
# Copying 20MB Bytes ...
5.333493 GB/Sec
5.633473 GB/Sec (with prefault)
Routine x86-64-stosq (movsq-based memset() in arch/x86/lib/memset_64.S)
# Copying 20MB Bytes ...
5.828484 GB/Sec
5.851183 GB/Sec (with prefault)
Routine x86-64-stosb (movsb-based memset() in arch/x86/lib/memset_64.S)
# Copying 20MB Bytes ...
5.553384 GB/Sec
5.956465 GB/Sec (with prefault)
This way you can see all results by executing one command only with "-r
all".
Patches coming as a reply to this message.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists