[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1502261224580.7451@gentwo.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 12:28:30 -0600 (CST)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
cc: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Aaron Jones <aaronmdjones@...il.com>, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...uxfoundation.org,
"Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@...nel.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@...il.com>,
Markku Savela <msa@...h.iki.fi>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] capabilities: Ambient capability set V1
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Well doing that breaks su.
>
> Don't what exactly? You're saying that doing
>
> pI' = pI
> pA' = pA (pA is ambient)
> pP' = (X & fP) | (pI & (fI | pA))
> pE' = pP' & (fE | pA)
>
> stopped su from having CAP_SETGID while
>
> pI' = pI
> pA' = pA (pA is ambient)
> pP' = (X & fP) | (pI & (fI | pA))
> pE' = pP' & fE
>
> worked? I'll hope you're saying both "fail", in which case
fE does not exist in cpu_vfs_cap_data. We only get fI and fP. Why in the
world does setcap allow setting fE?
V1 does not use fE. In my newer attempt, I seemed to have worked
with zeroed field that I assumed was filled in.
I will just do
pE' = pP'
Ok?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists