[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJAp7OgOjsLe2c66k8ocSCpg_JtHCJbofcxjbgBoG6fd8iFPxg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:00:09 -0800
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@...o.se>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] ARM: dts: apq8064: add RPM regulators support
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla
<srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org> wrote:
> This patch adds rpm node to apq8064 dt as rpm would be used by other
> devices for regulator support. Also adds all the regulators in the rpm.
>
This looks good, with Kumars suggestion of GIT defines
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
However, this binding is not merged yet and Stephen have requesting a
complete redesign of the binding as well as the code. So that has to
be concluded first, I presume.
Separate of that, as it's highly likely that everyone will follow the
pcb design guidelines for apq8064 the vin-supplies should be okay to
specify at this level (and not in all board files). Perhaps also the
switching frequencies for the SMPSs?
Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists