[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150226211324.GB19273@mail.hallyn.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:13:24 -0600
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Aaron Jones <aaronmdjones@...il.com>, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...uxfoundation.org,
"Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@...nel.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@...il.com>,
Markku Savela <msa@...h.iki.fi>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] capabilities: Ambient capability set V1
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 03:09:48PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>
> > > Same problem as before. The ambient bits will not be set in pE'.
> >
> > And what if I weren't scatterbrained and we did
> >
> > if (pA)
> > pE' = pP'
> > else
> > pE' = pP' & fE
> >
> > All pP' bits would be set in pE'.
>
> Ok and the non ambient case would break because fE is not available?
> Doesnt this reduce to
>
> pE' = pP'
>
> in either case?
No. fE is not "not available". If you set it with setcap, you *should*
(if i'm tinking right) find fE full when calculating the new capability
sets, because of magic_etc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists