[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150226225853.GM8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 22:58:53 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] coresight-stm: adding driver for CoreSight STM
component
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 04:24:53PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> We really shouldn't do private implementation here. It there really
> any reason not to allow readq/writeq generically for 32-bit or just
> for arm32?
My argument has always been that drivers should do the emulation of
64-bit accesses when there is no native support.
IO registers tend to have side effects when read/written. How do we
know whether the low-half or the high-half should be written first?
This isn't something that an architecture can really dictate. What
may be right for one hardware device may not be correct for another.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists