[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150225231036.7c0de2b8@grimm.local.home>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 23:10:36 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc: <mingo@...hat.com>, <hpa@...or.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <luto@...capital.net>, <oleg@...hat.com>,
<masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <lizefan@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, traps: Enable DEBUG_STACK after cpu_init() for
TRAP_DB/BP.
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:57:56 +0800
Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com> wrote:
> Before this patch early_trap_init() installs DEBUG_STACK for X86_TRAP_BP
> and X86_TRAP_DB. However, DEBUG_STACK doesn't work correctly until
> cpu_init() <-- trap_init().
>
> This patch passes 0 to set_intr_gate_ist() and
> set_system_intr_gate_ist() instead of DEBUG_STACK to let it use same
> stack as kernel, and installs DEBUG_STACK for them in trap_init().
>
> As core runs at ring 0 between early_trap_init() and trap_init(), there
> is no chance to get a bad stack before trap_init().
>
> As NMI is also enabled in trap_init(), we don't need to care about
> is_debug_stack() and related things used in arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c.
Looks fine to me, except for some grammar issues in the comments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> index 9d2073e..a9b8640 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -925,9 +925,16 @@ dotraplinkage void do_iret_error(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
> /* Set of traps needed for early debugging. */
> void __init early_trap_init(void)
> {
> - set_intr_gate_ist(X86_TRAP_DB, &debug, DEBUG_STACK);
> + /*
> + * Don't set ist to DEBUG_STACK as it doesn't work until TSS is
> + * ready in cpu_init() <-- trap_init(). Before trap_init(), CPU
> + * runs at ring 0 so there should be impossible to hit a invalid
"so it should be impossible", although I might prefer, "it is
impossible to", but nothing is ever guaranteed.
"an invalid"
> + * stack. Use original stack is enough. DEBUG_STACK will be
"Using the original stack works well enough at this early stage."
> + * equipped after cpu_init() in trap_init().
> + */
> + set_intr_gate_ist(X86_TRAP_DB, &debug, 0);
> /* int3 can be called from all */
> - set_system_intr_gate_ist(X86_TRAP_BP, &int3, DEBUG_STACK);
> + set_system_intr_gate_ist(X86_TRAP_BP, &int3, 0);
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> set_intr_gate(X86_TRAP_PF, page_fault);
> #endif
> @@ -1005,6 +1012,15 @@ void __init trap_init(void)
> */
> cpu_init();
>
> + /*
> + * X86_TRAP_DB and X86_TRAP_BP have been setup
> + * in early_trap_init(). However, DEBUG_STACK works only after
> + * cpu_init() load TSS. See comments in early_trap_init().
"cpu_init() loads TSS"
-- Steve
> + */
> + set_intr_gate_ist(X86_TRAP_DB, &debug, DEBUG_STACK);
> + /* int3 can be called from all */
> + set_system_intr_gate_ist(X86_TRAP_BP, &int3, DEBUG_STACK);
> +
> x86_init.irqs.trap_init();
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists