[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150227075829.GC21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 08:58:29 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: kan.liang@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] proc: introduce /proc/<pid>/lbr_stack
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 09:44:48AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 05:49:57PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 03:43:41AM +0000, kan.liang@...el.com wrote:
> > > From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
> > >
> > > Haswell has a new feature that utilizes the existing Last Branch Record
> > > facility to record call chains. It has been implemented in perf. The
> > > call chains information is saved during perf event context.
> > >
> > > This patch exposes a /proc/<pid>/lbr_stack file that shows the saved LBR
> > > call chain information.
> >
> > But why? I mean, this thing is only useful if you have a concurrently
> > running perf record that selects the LBR-stack stuff.
> >
> > And if you have that, you might as well look at its output instead. Why
> > add this unconditional proc file that doesn't function on its own?
>
> perf record doesn't show where you're currently blocked.
Of course it does; look at perf inject -s.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1225774
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1225775
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists