linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v10 2/2] docs: add missing and new /proc/PID/status file entries, fix typos

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5871495633F38949900D2BF2DC04883E73819258@G08CNEXMBPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local>
Date:	Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:05:09 +0000
From:	"Chen, Hanxiao" <chenhanxiao@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	"containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
	<containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@....net>,
	Nathan Scott <nathans@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v10 2/2] docs: add missing and new /proc/PID/status file
 entries, fix typos



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@...ux-foundation.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 5:02 AM
> To: Chen, Hanxiao/陈 晗霄
> Cc: Eric W. Biederman; containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-doc@...r.kernel.org; Serge Hallyn; Jonathan
> Corbet; Gui, Jianfeng/归 剑峰; Nathan Scott
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/2] docs: add missing and new /proc/PID/status file entries,
> fix typos
> 
> On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 18:45:50 +0800 Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Nathan Scott <nathans@...hat.com>
> >
> > From: Nathan Scott <nathans@...hat.com>
> >
> > docs: add missing and new /proc/PID/status file entries, fix typos
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@...hat.com>
> 
> This should have had your signoff, because you were on the patch
> delivery path (Documentation/SubmittingPatches section 11 has details).
> 
> I have made that change to my copy of this patch.

Hi,

Thanks for your help.
I'll be more careful next time.

Thank you very much.

Regards,
- Chen