linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] ocfs2: remove unneeded variable 'status'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHb8M2CkVZxJQ_aD7sq4B5UjL6ewgCa4YTW0jjbGyvXN+eeYPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:29:42 +0900
From:	DaeSeok Youn <daeseok.youn@...il.com>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, mfasheh@...e.com,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
	"ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com" <ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ocfs2: remove unneeded variable 'status'

Hi,

2015-02-27 18:41 GMT+09:00 Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:27 AM, DaeSeok Youn <daeseok.youn@...il.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think this patch was already queued. Can I send this patch again
>> after update changelog?
>
> One thing that is much more important, how did you test this patch? Did you?

I couldn't test, actually I don't have the environment for testing
this file system.
just looking this file for cleaning up and found this.

Thanks.

Daeseok Youn.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> //richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/