[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mw3zlght.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 22:21:26 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
oleg@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] module: Optimize __module_address() using a latched RB-tree
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:43:09PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Assuming struct module is cacheline aligned, Rusty? from what I can find
> its squirreled away in some data structure:
>
> mod = (void *)info->sechdrs[info->index.mod].sh_addr
>
> And I can't seem to quickly find its alignment. If its not cacheline
> aligned, can we make it so?
If the ELF says to align it, it will be aligned. Thus your patch
below should make it Just Work:
> @@ -278,7 +276,7 @@
> int (*init)(void);
>
> /* If this is non-NULL, vfree after init() returns */
> - void *module_init;
> + void *module_init ____cacheline_aligned;
>
> /* Here is the actual code + data, vfree'd on unload. */
> void *module_core;
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists