linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: APIC improvements (with bonus mixed mode)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150227152236.GE2034@potion.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:22:36 +0100
From:	Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
To:	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Cc:	Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Nadav Amit <namit@...technion.ac.il>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: APIC improvements (with bonus mixed mode)

2015-02-26 19:31-0300, Marcelo Tosatti:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:49:53AM +0200, Nadav Amit wrote:
> > Marcello, Radim,
> > 
> > As you know - I can run some tests on the patches and whether they comply
> > with real hardware. Please let me know which version to test and I’ll try to
> > do next week.

Please do, this series implements a subset of what I found about real
hardware behavior, the rest didn't make much sense.
(I'd be grateful for any report about real hardware.)

> From what i understand Radim did run a set of tests (with a modified
> Linux kernel) to find out the information on mixed mode.
> 
> However its not clear what that behaviour is.

Exactly.

Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/