[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150227153905.GA12562@node.dhcp.inet.fi>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:39:05 +0200
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: "D. Cooper Stevenson" <cooper@...per.stevenson.name>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Non-linear Remap Vs. VM Cleanup: Performance Hit
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 02:36:25PM -0800, D. Cooper Stevenson wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I read the Linus's release for RC1. One of his favorite features in the
> release are, "actually some vm cleanups, where this release is getting rid
> of the largely unused non-linear remapping code (replaced with just
> emulating it with lots of smaller mappings) and unifies the NUMA and
> PROTNONE handling for page tables."
>
> I understand that non-linear page remapping is unused (and, presumably,
> reduces the code base size) but according to the remap_file_pages man page
> (http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/remap_file_pages.2.html) non-linear
> system will be, "eventually be replaced by a slower in-kernel emulation."
>
> Was this a change of necessity? What gives?
As with all cleanups it's not necessary, but it makes life easier.
It removed >1.5k lines of non-trivial code from critical path of the
kernel. It's rarely used and tend to be error-prone. And developers need
to be aware about exists of non-linear mapping while implementing new
features.
For instance, faultaround feature I've implemented was broken for
non-linear mapping for some time and it took time to track it down.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists