linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] add nproc cgroup subsystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:15:51 -0500
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Tim Hockin <thockin@...gle.com>
Cc:	Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@...il.com>,
	Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>, lizefan@...wei.com,
	mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, richard@....at,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] add nproc cgroup subsystem

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 09:12:45AM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> I was told that the plan was to use kmemcg - but I was told that YEARS
> AGO.  In the mean time we all either do our own thing or we do nothing
> and suffer.

Wasn't it like a year ago?  Yeah, it's taking longer than everybody
hoped but seriously kmemcg reclaimer just got merged and also did the
new memcg interface which will tie kmemcg and memcg together.

> Something like this is long overdue, IMO, and is still more
> appropriate and obvious than kmemcg anyway.

Thanks for chiming in again but if you aren't bringing out anything
new to the table (I don't remember you doing that last time either),
I'm not sure why the decision would be different this time.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/