[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150227181447.GA11594@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:14:47 +0100
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Stathis Voukelatos <stathis.voukelatos@...n.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] Linn Ethernet Packet Sniffer driver
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 05:09:24PM +0000, Stathis Voukelatos wrote:
> To summarize (and confirm my understanding) your suggestion is for the
> sniffer to be configured to match PTP packets and (similarly to the
> dp83640) return the Message Type and Sequence Id fields that will allow
> them to be matched to an sk_buf that has been passed from the stack.
> Then the sk_buf can be timestamped using the sniffer timestamp.
Yes.
> The H/W does have the capability to do that. However, in order to
> implement it there will be some architectural changes needed
> in the kernel. This module cannot really pretend to be a PHY.
> In the real world it sits between the MAC and the PHY.
Right.
Here is one idea. Put a link to the TS device in the PHY's DT node.
Then, in phy_probe, check if the PHY's four methods, ts_info,
hwtstamp, rxtstamp, and txtstamp, are all null. If so, check for a DT
link from the PHY's node to a TS device driver. If found, then set
the four methods to call into the TS driver's callbacks.
Just off of the top of my head.
Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists