linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM64: cmpxchg.h: Clear the exclusive access bit on fail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJhHMCC98dPnx=ng3zp5ZZmzOZkdPXaA1bmcQJuhQj9wb7CRhw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 27 Feb 2015 13:25:25 -0500
From:	Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	Steve Capper <steve.capper@...aro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM64: cmpxchg.h: Clear the exclusive access bit on fail

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 05:46:55AM +0000, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>> In cmpxchg(), we do a load exclusive on an address and upon a comparison fail,
>> we skip the store exclusive instruction. This can result in the exclusive bit
>> still set. If there was a store exclusive after this to the same address, that
>> will see the exclusive bit set. This should not happen.
>
> ... and the problem with that is?

Consider the following scenario:

            P0                    P1
            ---------------------------------
            ldxr x7, [B]                         // exclusive bit set
            add  x7, x7, #1
                                str ..., [B]     // exclusive bit cleared
cmpxchg:
            ldxr x0, [B]                         // exclusive bit set
            cmp  x0, #0                        // cmp fails
            b.ne 1f                               // branch taken
            stxr x1, [B]                         // end of cmpxchg
1:
            stxr x7, [B]                        // succeeds?


    The last store exclusive succeeds since the exclusive bit is set which
should not happen. Clearing the exclusive bit before returning from cmpxchg
prevents this happening.

Now I am not sure how likely this will happen. One can argue that a cmpxchg()
will not happen between an external ldxr/stxr. But isn't clearing the exclusive
bit better?

-- 
Pranith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/