[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150227214904.GQ3964@htj.duckdns.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:49:04 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Tim Hockin <thockin@...kin.org>
Cc: Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@...il.com>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, mingo <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
richard <richard@....at>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] add nproc cgroup subsystem
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 01:45:09PM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> Are you willing to put a drop-dead date on it? If we don't have
> kmemcg working well enough to _actually_ bound PID usage and FD usage
> by, say, June 1st, will you then accept a patch to this effect? If
> the answer is no, then I have zero faith that it's coming any time
> soon - I heard this 2 years ago. I believed you then.
Tim, cut this bullshit. That's not how kernel development works.
Contribute to techincal discussion or shut it. I'm really getting
tired of your whining without any useful substance.
> I see further downthread that you said you'll think about it. Thank
> you. Just because our use cases are not normal does not mean we're
> not valid :)
And can you even see why that made progress?
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists