linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] genirq: better describe IRQF_NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150227150810.685084df@lwn.net>
Date:	Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:08:10 -0700
From:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: better describe IRQF_NO_SUSPEND semantics

On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:53:46 +0000
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:

> This patch updates the documentation regarding IRQF_NO_SUSPEND to make
> this caveat explicit, hopefully making future misuse rarer. Cleanup of
> existing misuse will occur as part of later patch series.

Applied (with Peter's ack) to the docs tree.

Thanks,

jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/