[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150227221100.GV5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 23:11:00 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq / PM: Add flag for shared NO_SUSPEND interrupt
lines
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:13:57PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, February 27, 2015 09:38:59 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Seems good to me. Should I take this through tip/irq ?
>
> I can apply it along with the previous IRQF_NO_SUSPEND documentation patch
> from Mark Rutland if you ACK it for me. :-)
Works for me,
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> > Also, should we warn if people use enable_irq_wake() where there is only
> > a single descriptor with NO_SUSPEND?
>
> We probably should do that, but that would be a separate patch IMO?
Agreed. Just wanted to raise the point.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists