[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150228101824.GW5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 11:18:24 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: kan.liang@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] proc: introduce /proc/<pid>/lbr_stack
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 03:57:02PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:05:45PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 09:54:34AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > > perf record doesn't show where you're currently blocked.
> > > >
> > > > Of course it does; look at perf inject -s.
> > >
> > > Trace points don't support the LBR stack.
> >
> > Yes, indeed. But would it not make much more sense to squirrel the LBR
> > state into sched:sched_switch and teach that inject -s thing to dtrt,
> > than to make a proc file that's available on all archs but will only
> > work on 1-2 x86 uarchs and only if you're also running the right magic
> > perf record at the same time?
>
> Yes. It would be nice to capture the whole PMU state in trace points.
> There are use models for this where it can work better than
> sampling.
>
> But that would be a lot bigger project than this simple file,
> which is already quite useful with minimal effort.
Its also the most horrible hack of an interface ever, so no go.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists