[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGTfZH2h4=PEk0BvG9ar3O7ne_rZdNEUJK_=BZu8KnCuQOBECQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 09:51:14 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@...il.com>
To: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"inki.dae@...sung.com" <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
"chanho61.park@...sung.com" <chanho61.park@...sung.com>,
Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
"jh80.chung@...sung.com" <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
ideal.song@...sung.com, Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@...sung.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] arm64: exynos5433: Enable ARMv8 based Exynos5433
(SoC) support
Hi Kukjin and Sylwester,
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com> wrote:
> On 02/24/2015 05:31 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Tuesday 24 February 2015 14:16:44 Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>> index 1b8e973..d83cea0 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>> @@ -154,6 +154,17 @@ config ARCH_EXYNOS
>>> help
>>> This enables support for Samsung Exynos SoC family
>>>
>>> +config ARCH_EXYNOS5433
>>> + bool "ARMv8 based Samsung Exynos5433"
>>> + select ARCH_EXYNOS
>>> + select COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG
>>> + select HAVE_S3C_RTC if RTC_CLASS
>>> + select PINCTRL
>>> + select PINCTRL_EXYNOS
>>> +
>>> + help
>>> + This enables support for Samsung Exynos5433 SoC family
>>> +
>>> config ARCH_EXYNOS7
>>> bool "ARMv8 based Samsung Exynos7"
>>> select ARCH_EXYNOS
>>> --
>>>
>>
>> Can we collapse all these entries into one for EXYNOS? I don't
>> want to end up with endless lists like we have on arm32 when
>> there is no platform specific code that is actually controlled
>> by this anway.
>
> I agree.
>
> I check the some issue for only using the CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS
> insead of CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS7 and CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5433.
>
> Each CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS{7|5433} configuraiton was used on following list:
> - CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS7
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/Makefile:1:dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS7) += exynos7-espresso.dtb
> drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile:17:obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS7) += clk-exynos7.o
> - CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5433
> drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile:13:obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5433) += clk-exynos5433.o
>
> We may can fix it as following by only using 'CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS' without any specific configuration.
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/Makefile:1:dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS) += exynos7-espresso.dtb
> drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile:17:obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS) += clk-exynos7.o clk-exynos5433.o
>
> I think that we need the opinion of Kukjin Kim (Exynos SoC Maintainer)
> and Sylwester Nawrocki(Samsung clock Maintainer)
I need yout opinion about using the CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS
instead of CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS7/CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5433?
Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists