[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJe_Zhf=GBb8AfnTLaGxGcZkVSm9TtdnTsmpH_MBmbMT8ViMDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 14:51:17 +0530
From: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
kernel@...inux.com, Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] clk: Provide always-on clock support
On 28 February 2015 at 02:44, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> Lots of platforms contain clocks which if turned off would prove fatal.
> The only way to recover from these catastrophic failures is to restart
> the board(s). Now, when a clock is registered with the framework it is
> compared against a list of provided always-on clock names which must be
> kept ungated. If it matches, we enable the existing CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED
> flag, which will prevent the common clk framework from attempting to
> gate it during the clk_disable_unused() procedure.
>
If a clock is critical on a certain board, it could be got+enabled
during early boot so there is always a user.
To be able to do that from DT, maybe add a new, say, CLK_ALWAYS_ON
flag could be made to initialize the clock with one phantom user
already. Or just reuse the CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED?
-Jassi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists