linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: spidev_test: Added functionalities

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150301182841.GA19947@debian.home>
Date:	Sun, 1 Mar 2015 19:28:41 +0100
From:	AdrianRemonda <adrianremonda@...il.com>
To:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	"open list:SPI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spidev_test: Added functionalities

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 03:11:17PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 20:08:44 +0100
> Adrian Remonda <adrianremonda@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > This is a patch that add functionalities to the spidev_test tool found
> > in Documentation/spi/spidev_test.c.
> 
> This seems good.  But our hope is to move useful code out of
> Documentation; care to submit a patch putting it properly somewhere under
> tools/?
> 
> (Meanwhile, I've applied this one).
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> jon

I apologize for the wrong patch format.
Should I contact the mantainer of the tool path and ask him where to add
it? Or how should I proceed?

Thanks,
Adrian

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/