lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150302085116.GD24151@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Mon, 2 Mar 2015 09:51:16 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, oleg@...hat.com,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	andi@...stfloor.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/9] seqlock: Better document
 raw_write_seqcount_latch()

On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 09:33:20AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 02:02:23PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:

> > The latch, AFAIU, takes care of making sure the new objects are
> > initialized before being published into the data structure, so there
> > would be no need to use RCU assign pointer. However, we really need
> > RCU around reads, along with a grace period between removal of an object
> > and its teardown.
> 
> So I do need the rcu_assign_pointer for the RB link because that also
> initializes the rb_node itself. Or put differently, be _very_ _VERY_
> sure your entire object is initialized before the latch.
> 
> Secondly, note that the latch does a WMB and rcu_assign_pointer does a
> RELEASE, these are not equivalent.
> 
> So I don't think I will highlight this particular point. If you're sure
> enough to know the difference you can get away with it, sure. But in
> general I think people should still use rcu_assign_pointer; if only to
> make Paul sleep better at night ;-)

Also note that if you do not use rcu_assign_pointer() one will at the
very least require WRITE_ONCE().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ