linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 15/16] target-s390x: Introduce facility test routine

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1425300248-40277-16-git-send-email-mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon,  2 Mar 2015 13:44:07 +0100
From:	Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	qemu-devel@...gnu.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
	"Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Andreas Faerber <afaerber@...e.de>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>,
	Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 15/16] target-s390x: Introduce facility test routine

The patch introduces routine s390_facility_test() which allows to
verify a specific facility bit is set.

Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 target-s390x/cpu-models.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 target-s390x/cpu-models.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target-s390x/cpu-models.c b/target-s390x/cpu-models.c
index 7ad61df..5c4eac5 100644
--- a/target-s390x/cpu-models.c
+++ b/target-s390x/cpu-models.c
@@ -698,3 +698,33 @@ bool s390_cpu_models_used(void)
 {
     return cpu_models_used;
 }
+
+static inline int test_facility(uint64_t *fac_list, uint16_t nr)
+{
+    uint16_t word = nr / BITS_PER_LONG;
+    uint16_t be_bit = (BITS_PER_LONG - 1) - (nr % BITS_PER_LONG);
+
+    return (nr < FAC_LIST_CPU_S390_SIZE_UINT1) ?
+        (fac_list[word] >> be_bit) & __UINT64_C(1) : 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * s390_test_facility:
+ * @nr: facility bit number to test
+ * @cc: cpu class to test
+ *
+ * The functions tests if the cpu facility identified by bit @nr is available
+ * to the cpu class @cc.
+ *
+ * Returns: a boolean value.
+ *
+ * Since: 2.3
+ */
+bool s390_test_facility(S390CPUClass *cc, uint16_t nr)
+{
+    if (!cc) {
+        return false;
+    }
+    return test_facility(cc->fac_list, nr) ? true : false;
+}
+
diff --git a/target-s390x/cpu-models.h b/target-s390x/cpu-models.h
index 3605aa4..557f5e5 100644
--- a/target-s390x/cpu-models.h
+++ b/target-s390x/cpu-models.h
@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ bool s390_cpu_classes_initialized(void);
 bool s390_probe_mode(void);
 void s390_cpu_model_init(S390CPUClass *cc);
 bool s390_cpu_models_used(void);
+bool s390_test_facility(S390CPUClass *cc, uint16_t nr);
 
 /*
  * bits 0-7   : CMOS generation
-- 
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/