[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150302133844.GA25560@potion.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 14:38:44 +0100
From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
To: Joel Schopp <joel.schopp@....com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
David Kaplan <David.Kaplan@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: svm: use kvm_fast_pio_in()
2015-02-27 18:04-0600, Joel Schopp:
> From: David Kaplan <David.Kaplan@....com>
>
> We can make the in instruction go faster the same way the out instruction is
> already.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Kaplan <David.Kaplan@....com>
> [extracted from larger unlrelated patch, forward ported, tested]
> Signed-off-by: Joel Schopp <joel.schopp@....com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -1907,6 +1907,8 @@ static int io_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> svm->next_rip = svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_2;
> skip_emulated_instruction(&svm->vcpu);
>
> + if (in)
> + return kvm_fast_pio_in(vcpu, size, port);
Have I missed a patch that defined kvm_fast_pio_in()?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists