[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1425306313-7234-2-git-send-email-daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 15:25:10 +0100
From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...marydata.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [RFC v2 1/4] locks: Remove unnecessary IS_POSIX test
Since following change
commit bd61e0a9c852de2d705b6f1bb2cc54c5774db570
Author: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...marydata.com>
Date: Fri Jan 16 15:05:55 2015 -0500
locks: convert posix locks to file_lock_context
all Posix locks are kept on their a separate list, so the test is
redudant.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...marydata.com>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
---
fs/locks.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index 365c82e..f63aa92 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -964,8 +964,6 @@ static int __posix_lock_file(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request, str
*/
if (request->fl_type != F_UNLCK) {
list_for_each_entry(fl, &ctx->flc_posix, fl_list) {
- if (!IS_POSIX(fl))
- continue;
if (!posix_locks_conflict(request, fl))
continue;
if (conflock)
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists