[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54F47534.7070204@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 09:35:32 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] cpusets,isolcpus: add file to show isolated cpus
in cpuset
On 03/02/2015 07:44 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 10:09 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:12:31PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
>>> Subject: cpusets,isolcpus: add file to show isolated cpus in cpuset
>>>
>>> The previous patch makes it so the code skips over isolcpus when
>>> building scheduler load balancing domains. This makes it hard to
>>> see for a user which of the CPUs in a cpuset are participating in
>>> load balancing, and which ones are isolated cpus.
>>>
>>> Add a cpuset.isolcpus file with info on which cpus in a cpuset are
>>> isolated CPUs.
>>>
>>> This file is read-only for now. In the future we could extend things
>>> so isolcpus can be changed at run time, for the root (system wide)
>>> cpuset only.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
>>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>>> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>
>>> Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
>>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
>>> Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>
>>> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
>>> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
>>> Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
>>
>> So let me start off by saying I hate isolcpus ;-)
>>
>> Let me further state that I had hopes we could extend cpusets to
>> natively provide the functionality isolcpus has, and kill isolcpus.
>
> +1
>
> That's where nohz_full goop belongs too.
Except nohz_full and isolcpus are very much global attributes of
each CPU, so I am not sure whether it would make sense to allow
configuration of this attribute anywhere other than the root
cpuset.
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists