[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPnjgZ0FWgRymBJ2MrZtJYUp+QJj+AXr3DPoU3NbuYC6BbZrDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 08:46:40 -0700
From: Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>
To: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
Cc: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
Dylan Reid <dgreid@...omium.org>,
Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Terje Bergström <tbergstrom@...dia.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/11] drm/tegra: Reset the SOR on probe
Hi,
On 2 March 2015 at 01:41, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Tomeu Vizoso
> <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com> wrote:
> > As there isn't a way for the firmware on the Nyan chromebooks to hand
> > over the display to the kernel.
>
> Could this have a side-effect on models for which the firmware *does*
> hand over the display to the kernel? E.g. temporary glitch or black
> screen?
>
> This is probably ok though, as such a handing over would need to be
> documented in the firmware/kernel command line, and could thus be
> caught to disable that code block if needed.
Is there a general way in which this hand-over is done, e.g. with a
device tree binding?
Regards,
Simon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists