[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150302113701.2171bdd5@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 11:37:01 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
andi@...stfloor.org, ast@...mgrid.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] mm: Add ___GFP_NOTRACE
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 10:01:00 -0600
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Add a gfp flag that allows kmalloc() et al to be used in tracing
> functions.
>
> The problem with using kmalloc for tracing is that the tracing
> subsystem should be able to trace kmalloc itself, which it can't do
> directly because of paths like kmalloc()->trace_kmalloc()->kmalloc()
> or kmalloc()->trace_mm_page_alloc()->kmalloc().
This part I don't like at all. Why can't the memory be preallocated
when the hist is created (the echo 'hist:...')?
kmalloc must never be called from any tracepoint callback.
This change is currently a showstopper.
-- Steve
>
> With this flag, tracing code could use a special version of kmalloc()
> that sets __GFP_NOTRACE on every allocation it does, while leaving the
> normal kmalloc() path untouched.
>
> This would allow any tracepoint in the kmalloc path to be avoided via
> DEFINE_EVENT_CONDITION() redefinitions of those events, which check
> for ___GFP_NOTRACE immediately in their execution and break if set,
> thereby avoiding the recursion.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists