[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54F498B1.6090409@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 10:06:57 -0700
From: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/19] Add timekeeping tests to kernel selftest
On 02/25/2015 03:32 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> I've hosted my timekeeping tests on github for the last few years:
> https://github.com/johnstultz-work/timetests
>
> but I suspect not too many folks have actually used them.
>
> I've been meaning to get them reworked and submitted into the
> selftest infrastructure, but haven't had much time until
> recently. So I wanted to send this out and get any feedback
> to see if they might be able to get into shape for the 4.1
> merge window.
>
> I've added both the non-desctructive and destructive tests
> (which set the time, possibly to strange values, or tries
> to trigger historical issues that could crash the machine).
> The destructive tests are run (as root, or with proper
> privledge) via:
> # make run_destructive_tests
>
I quickly browsed through the tests. Looks good to me. One
comment on test run scope. Since timers now include destructive
tests, run_tests target should only run the non-destructive by
default and destructive tests.
I didn't see the run_destructive_tests in this set of changes
in the timers/Makefile.
Please see cpu-hotplug and memory-hotplug as examples that
support default and full range tests.
thanks,
-- Shuah
--
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@....samsung.com | (970) 217-8978
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists