[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150302183237.GB23085@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 19:32:37 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Tavis Ormandy <taviso@...gle.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86/regsets: change xstateregs_get/set to use
->xsave.i387 rather than ->fxsave
Cosmetic. xstateregs_get() and xstateregs_set() abuse ->fxsave to access
xsave->i387.sw_reserved. This is correct, ->fxsave and xsave->i387 share
the same memory, but imho this looks confusing.
And we can make this code more readable if we add "struct xsave_struct *"
local.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/i387.c | 25 +++++++++----------------
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c b/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
index 8e070a6..4b12df8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
@@ -339,6 +339,7 @@ int xstateregs_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
unsigned int pos, unsigned int count,
void *kbuf, void __user *ubuf)
{
+ struct xsave_struct *xsave = &target->thread.fpu.state->xsave;
int ret;
if (!cpu_has_xsave)
@@ -353,14 +354,12 @@ int xstateregs_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
* memory layout in the thread struct, so that we can copy the entire
* xstateregs to the user using one user_regset_copyout().
*/
- memcpy(&target->thread.fpu.state->fxsave.sw_reserved,
- xstate_fx_sw_bytes, sizeof(xstate_fx_sw_bytes));
-
+ memcpy(&xsave->i387.sw_reserved,
+ xstate_fx_sw_bytes, sizeof(xstate_fx_sw_bytes));
/*
* Copy the xstate memory layout.
*/
- ret = user_regset_copyout(&pos, &count, &kbuf, &ubuf,
- &target->thread.fpu.state->xsave, 0, -1);
+ ret = user_regset_copyout(&pos, &count, &kbuf, &ubuf, xsave, 0, -1);
return ret;
}
@@ -368,8 +367,8 @@ int xstateregs_set(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
unsigned int pos, unsigned int count,
const void *kbuf, const void __user *ubuf)
{
+ struct xsave_struct *xsave = &target->thread.fpu.state->xsave;
int ret;
- struct xsave_hdr_struct *xsave_hdr;
if (!cpu_has_xsave)
return -ENODEV;
@@ -378,22 +377,16 @@ int xstateregs_set(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
if (ret)
return ret;
- ret = user_regset_copyin(&pos, &count, &kbuf, &ubuf,
- &target->thread.fpu.state->xsave, 0, -1);
-
+ ret = user_regset_copyin(&pos, &count, &kbuf, &ubuf, xsave, 0, -1);
/*
* mxcsr reserved bits must be masked to zero for security reasons.
*/
- target->thread.fpu.state->fxsave.mxcsr &= mxcsr_feature_mask;
-
- xsave_hdr = &target->thread.fpu.state->xsave.xsave_hdr;
-
- xsave_hdr->xstate_bv &= pcntxt_mask;
+ xsave->i387.mxcsr &= mxcsr_feature_mask;
+ xsave->xsave_hdr.xstate_bv &= pcntxt_mask;
/*
* These bits must be zero.
*/
- memset(xsave_hdr->reserved, 0, 48);
-
+ memset(&xsave->xsave_hdr.reserved, 0, 48);
return ret;
}
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists