[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5h7fuz8b3o.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 20:15:23 +0100
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: regcache_sync() errors for read-only registers cache
At Mon, 2 Mar 2015 18:24:18 +0000,
Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 01:59:30PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> > A quick fix is the patch like below, but obviously it doesn't cover
> > the all cases but only addresses the signle rw.
>
> Please don't bury patches in the middle of mails, that just means that
> if the patch is useful it's painful to apply.
The --scissors option of git am is your friend.
> Your patch seems fine but
> can you please resend in a directly applyable format unless something in
> the below indicates against that...
Hm, so do you think that my patch is the best way to fix? I wasn't
sure about it, that's why I wrote in that style.
> > Also, _regmap_write() itself calls again regmap_writeable(), so it's
> > superfluous. Alternatively, we may check -EIO from _regmap_write()
> > and treat as a special case not to show the error. Or, add a
> > parameter to skip regmap_writeable() call.
>
> I'm sorry but I can't parse the above - what is "it" in this context?
regmap_wrietable() call in _regmap_write().
> Silently ignoring -EIO from the physical register write sounds like a
> very bad idea though, that seems likely to discard actual errors.
Right, in that case, a special error code might be used. But this
sounds like an overkill, too.
thanks,
Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists