[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMEtUuwvJZZ2UpMGm+=BJ88W87EOb-Rof4Ai3ya+Mto5_K8Thg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 11:29:35 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] mm: Add ___GFP_NOTRACE
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Tom Zanussi
<tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > The idea would be that instead of getting your individually kmalloc'ed
>> > elements on-demand from kmalloc while in the handler, you'd get them
>> > from a pool you've pre-allocated when you set up the table. This could
>> > be from a list of individual entries you've already kmalloc'ed ahead of
>> > time, or from an array of n * sizeof(entry).
>>
>> would work, but kinda ugly, since we will pre-allocate a lot
>> and may not be using it at all.
>>
>
> That's true but you have a user-defined map limit anyway, which you can
> adjust to minimize wastage. And allocating ahead of time also means you
> perturb the system less while actually tracing.
nope. it's the other way around.
using kmalloc is faster and less overhead on the whole system
then grabbing cache-cold objects from special pool.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists