[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 14:04:33 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1 linux-next RESEND] task IO accounting: add
conditional read/write counters
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 21:16:35 +0100 Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be> wrote:
> This patch adds syscre and syscwe respectively effective read/write
> syscall counters. We already had syscr/syscw which were
> unconditionally incremented. Doing the difference between those
> variables could give interesting statistics.
I don't think that "could give interesting statistics" is sufficient
justification for adding overhead and extending the Linux userspace
interface.
More specificity would help, including real-worldish use cases which
demonstrate the value.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists