[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 12:25:41 +0800
From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Thomas Voegtle <tv@...96.de>, Hudd <hedede.l@...il.com>,
Prakash Punnoor <prakash@...noor.de>,
Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
Subject: [Debug 2/2] x86/PCI/ACPI: Relax ACPI resource descriptor checks to work around BIOS bugs
Some BIOSes report incorrect length for ACPI address space descriptors,
so relax the checks to avoid regressions.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/resource.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/resource.c b/drivers/acpi/resource.c
index c723668e3e27..5589a6e2a023 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/resource.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/resource.c
@@ -42,8 +42,10 @@ static bool acpi_dev_resource_len_valid(u64 start, u64 end, u64 len, bool io)
* CHECKME: len might be required to check versus a minimum
* length as well. 1 for io is fine, but for memory it does
* not make any sense at all.
+ * Note: some BIOSes report incorrect length for ACPI address space
+ * descriptor, so remove check of 'reslen == len' to avoid regression.
*/
- if (len && reslen && reslen == len && start <= end)
+ if (len && reslen && start <= end)
return true;
pr_debug("ACPI: invalid or unassigned resource %s [%016llx - %016llx] length [%016llx]\n",
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists