lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 03 Mar 2015 14:43:00 +0530
From:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Stefan Strogin <s.strogin@...tner.samsung.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Stefan Strogin <s.strogin@...tner.samsung.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
	Dmitry Safonov <d.safonov@...tner.samsung.com>,
	Pintu Kumar <pintu.k@...sung.com>,
	Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@...sung.com>,
	Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
	SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>,
	Hui Zhu <zhuhui@...omi.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Dyasly Sergey <s.dyasly@...sung.com>,
	Vyacheslav Tyrtov <v.tyrtov@...sung.com>,
	Aleksei Mateosian <a.mateosian@...sung.com>,
	gregory.0xf0@...il.com, sasha.levin@...cle.com, gioh.kim@....com,
	pavel@....cz, stefan.strogin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] mm: cma: add trace events to debug physically-contiguous memory allocations

Stefan Strogin <s.strogin@...tner.samsung.com> writes:

> Add trace events for cma_alloc() and cma_release().
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Strogin <s.strogin@...tner.samsung.com>
> ---
>  include/trace/events/cma.h | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/cma.c                   |  6 +++++
>  2 files changed, 63 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 include/trace/events/cma.h
>
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/cma.h b/include/trace/events/cma.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..3fe7a56
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/trace/events/cma.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
> +#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
> +#define TRACE_SYSTEM cma
> +
> +#if !defined(_TRACE_CMA_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
> +#define _TRACE_CMA_H
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(cma_alloc,
> +
> +	TP_PROTO(struct cma *cma, unsigned long pfn, int count),
> +
> +	TP_ARGS(cma, pfn, count),
> +
> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +		__field(unsigned long, pfn)
> +		__field(unsigned long, count)
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_fast_assign(
> +		__entry->pfn = pfn;
> +		__entry->count = count;
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_printk("pfn=%lu page=%p count=%lu\n",
> +		  __entry->pfn,
> +		  pfn_to_page(__entry->pfn),
> +		  __entry->count)
> +);
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(cma_release,
> +
> +	TP_PROTO(struct cma *cma, unsigned long pfn, int count),
> +
> +	TP_ARGS(cma, pfn, count),
> +
> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +		__field(unsigned long, pfn)
> +		__field(unsigned long, count)
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_fast_assign(
> +		__entry->pfn = pfn;
> +		__entry->count = count;
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_printk("pfn=%lu page=%p count=%lu\n",
> +		  __entry->pfn,
> +		  pfn_to_page(__entry->pfn),
> +		  __entry->count)
> +);
> +
> +#endif /* _TRACE_CMA_H */
> +
> +/* This part must be outside protection */
> +#include <trace/define_trace.h>
> diff --git a/mm/cma.c b/mm/cma.c
> index 9e3d44a..3a63c96 100644
> --- a/mm/cma.c
> +++ b/mm/cma.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>  #  define DEBUG
>  #endif
>  #endif
> +#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>
>  #include <linux/memblock.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
> @@ -34,6 +35,7 @@
>  #include <linux/cma.h>
>  #include <linux/highmem.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <trace/events/cma.h>
>
>  #include "cma.h"
>
> @@ -408,6 +410,9 @@ struct page *cma_alloc(struct cma *cma, int count, unsigned int align)
>  		start = bitmap_no + mask + 1;
>  	}
>
> +	if (page)
> +		trace_cma_alloc(cma, pfn, count);
> +
>  	pr_debug("%s(): returned %p\n", __func__, page);
>  	return page;
>  }
> @@ -440,6 +445,7 @@ bool cma_release(struct cma *cma, struct page *pages, int count)
>
>  	free_contig_range(pfn, count);
>  	cma_clear_bitmap(cma, pfn, count);
> +	trace_cma_release(cma, pfn, count);
>
>  	return true;

Are we interested only in successful allocation and release ? Should we also
have the trace point carry information regarding failure ?

-aneesh

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ