linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [RFC] ARM: shmobile: R-Car Gen2: Add da9063/da9210 regulator quirk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUhk+5_1SghtmP=Gb_Qr+Ojgd93Ke0jLSJBk6yvWgA1ug@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 3 Mar 2015 10:37:52 +0100
From:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] ARM: shmobile: R-Car Gen2: Add da9063/da9210
 regulator quirk

Hi Simon,

On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 09:49:11PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 06:28:43PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> >> The r8a7791/koelsch development board has da9063 and da9210 regulators.
>> >> Both regulators have their interrupt request lines tied to the same
>> >> interrupt pin (IRQ2) on the SoC.
>> >>
>> >> After boot-up, both the da9063 and da9210 seem to assert their interrupt
>> >> request lines.  Hence as soon as one driver requests this irq, it gets
>> >> stuck in an interrupt storm, as it only manages to deassert its own
>> >> interrupt request line, and the other driver hasn't installed an
>> >> interrupt handler yet.
>> >>
>> >> To handle this, install a quirk that masks the interrupts in both the
>> >> da9063 and da9210.  This quirk has to run after the i2c master driver
>> >> has been initialized, but before the i2c slave drivers are initialized.

>> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_I2C
>> >
>> > Is it a realistic scenario that I2C and slave drivers are modules?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> Unfortunately that's more difficult to support, as the code references
>> i2c_bus_type and i2c_adapter_type.
>>
>> i2c_bus_type is needed to register the notifier.
>> i2c_adapter_type is needed to distinguish between i2c adapters and clients,
>> as the notifier is called for both with action BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE.

Given we already have a few "select I2C" under arch/arm, I guess it won't
hurt much to let ARCH_R8A7790 and ARCH_R8A7791 select I2C, too.

> this seems reasonable enough to me, however, I'd like to let it hang out
> for a bit longer to see if there is any further review. To that end could
> you consider posting a non-RFC version for review if you wish to pursue
> this approach further?

Sure, will do after a bit of more cooking, and updating with the findings of
more test results, if needed.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/